| Vol 10, No 7 |
OR Manager |
17 |
|
For
instance, written action plans for improving medical equipment safety and
efficacy are strong indicators of compliance. Ask questions to see if your
hospital has a functioning equipment management program (see box on page
16). Pointers for
standard compliance. Employee training If the
equipment meets criteria for risk, it must be included regardless of
ownership. This pertains to physician-owned equipment, leased equipment,
rentals, and loaners. Delegate field checks of the equipment inventory to
the appropriate people to make sure it is right--down to the last digit of
the model and serial numbers. |
Information required in equipment inventory |
|
|
The OR's equipment inventory should include at least this information:
|
devices
such as endoscopy equipment, and "C" for important but
relatively simple or reliable equipment such as surgical lights)
|
|
|
for instance, the ECRI Source Book for
device terminology, it will be easier to make interhospital comparisons of
device performance. Comparisons can also be made to recorded incidents
in public databases," Barkalow said. Ideally, the inventory can be correlated with an OR employee database to keep track of who has been trained on what equipment and when. One approach is to develop such a database with the nursing education department to maintain the training information. Employee training needs to be model-specific. Say your hospital buys a new model of electrosurgical unit of the same brand you already own. Can you document that employees received training on that specific model, including the new features?
"When you talk
about 'failure' of medical devices, half or more may be related to user
education, not the hardware," Barkalow said. |
the
hospital to spot trends. For example, you could call up a list of
"A" priority equipment such as ventilators, anesthesia machines,
and surgical lasers, sorted in descending order by the number of incidents
in the past six months. Examine the incidents in detail and look for
patterns of failure that can be addressed by, say, specific user
education, a change in preventive maintenance, or, perhaps, device
replacement. This analysis should be done with the clinical engineer
or qualified biomedical equipment technician. In another six months, call up the same list. If the quality improvement effort is successful, the same devices should no longer be at the top of the problem list.
Some kinds of
equipment tend to be over looked. An example is pneumatic equipment
such as surgical drills powered by compressed gas. Continued on page 19 |
|